According to Kozlovic these figures include twenty-five character properties. Dr. Christopher Deacy judges this approach as uncritical because what happens, when one Christ-figure doesn't include all twenty-five properties? Kozlovic didn't answer this question in his article "The Structural Characteristics of the Cinemativ Christ-figure". In addition to the first question Deacy advert to the problem: What would be done, if several Christ-figures appeared in the movie?
As laid down in Deacys article, it could be possible that biblical parallels emerge, but there is a variety of interpretations. For this reason not every hero have to be a Christ-figure, it would be an overenthusiastiv view as Robert Johnston points it out too.
Dr. Christopher Deacy |
According to Deacy there are not only the one or the other side to interpretate movie- figures like Kozlovic point it out, but there are several ways to interpretate them.
Reference:
Deacy C. 2006. Reflections on the Uncritical Appropriation of Cinematic Christ-Figures: Holy Other or Wholly Inadequate? Journal of Religion and Popular Culture, 13, Summer.
Kozlovic, Anton Karl. Fall 2004. “The Structural Characteristics of the Cinematic Christ-figure.” In Journal of Religion and Popular Culture 8.
http://www.kent.ac.uk/secl/thrs/staff/deacy.html
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen